InnoK logo fehér

Report on the Living Lab concept and the domestic program

Contact

Report on the Living Lab concept and the domestic program

Executive summary

The transformation of the innovation paradigm: From closed systems to the Living Lab

In the 21st century economic and social environment, the effectiveness of traditional, linear and closed innovation models has been questioned. According to previous practice, research and development departments operated in isolation from the outside world, where developers refined ideas from basic research and then introduced them to the market. In contrast, the paradigm of Open Innovation recognized that useful knowledge is not concentrated exclusively within the organization, but is also widely spread in the external environment.

In this new approach, the involvement of external knowledge – whether it is technology or user experience – becomes equivalent to internal developments. One of the most advanced, structured manifestations of this open innovation ecosystem is the Living Lab (Community Innovation Lab). The Living Lab does not just denote a physical space, but a user-centered open innovation ecosystem, where research and development take place in real-life situations, with the active involvement of users. The essence of the concept is that the subject of development (the user) becomes an active participant, a “co-author” of the process.

Strategic significance and value creation

The strategic importance of Living Labs lies in their ability to bridge the so-called pre-commercial gap between applied research and market launch. During development processes, it often happens that prototypes operating in laboratory conditions fail in the real market environment because they do not meet the actual needs of users. Research shows that a significant part, up to 80%, of new products and services developed without consumer involvement fail after launch.

Through co-creation within the Living Lab framework, organizations receive direct feedback on the future acceptance of their products. Since testing takes place in a natural living or working environment, the results are more reliable than in the case of artificial focus group studies. This methodology not only reduces risk, but can also result in significant cost and time savings through the effective integration of external developments and ideas.

Operating mechanism: Social innovation ecosystem

The operation of Living Labs is based on the Quadruple Helix model, in which four main actors work together: the public sector, the scientific community, private companies and civil society (users). International practice shows that this model is excellent for addressing not only technological but also social problems.

During the process, users are not passive responders, but shapers of design and development. The Living Lab environment allows for immediate validation (testing) or rejection of hypotheses. This is especially important in the case of social innovations, where the goal is not only profit maximization, but also increasing social welfare and solving complex problems. The synergy of international and national networks helps to disseminate best practices and share knowledge.

Current domestic program: ELTE and TINLAB initiative

A major programme supported by the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) is currently underway in Hungary, which aims to promote social innovations within the framework of Living Labs. Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE) is a member of the international consortium that operates National Social Innovation Competence Centres within the framework of the Social Innovation Plus (SI Plus) programme.

The objectives and implementation of the program can be summarized as follows:

  • Objective: To identify relevant social problems for which solutions that can be adapted and replicated can be developed later.
  • Methodology: The National Competence Center will set up an expert working group that will support problem-solving organizations through a 2 x 2-day fieldwork and workshop series.
  • Innovation mentoring: The program focuses not only on solving the specific problem, but also on developing the existing innovation mentoring methodology in a live situation, which will be incorporated into the knowledge base.
  • Ecosystem building: The goal of the initiative is to increase social awareness of the local ecosystem and to establish a solution-centric approach by involving a wide range of stakeholders.

This program is an excellent example of how the Living Lab theory can be put into practice with the professional support of the domestic institutional system (e.g. ELTE Innovation Center).

Closing thoughts

Overall, Living Lab is not just a methodology, but a key tool for increasing competitiveness and social utility. It provides an opportunity for organizations to break out of closed development cycles and create viable solutions that respond to real needs. The current domestic programs, such as those implemented at ELTE and TINLAB (National Laboratory for Social Innovation), open the door to international knowledge transfer and lay the foundation for future social innovation activities in Hungary.

What is a Living Lab? – Definition and theoretical background

Origin and development of the concept

The concept of the Living Lab (Community Innovation Lab) has become a defining tool in innovation management in recent decades. The father of the term is considered to be William Mitchell, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), who created the definition in 2003. In Mitchell’s original interpretation, a Living Lab meant a space that functions as a laboratory – even an entire building or city – where developers and researchers could observe people’s behavior, reactions and interactions with new technologies in a real, life-like environment. This approach allowed for early validation (testing) of hypotheses in the “real world” as opposed to sterile laboratory conditions.

The term has expanded and differentiated significantly over the years. While it initially referred to a physical test environment, it is now understood more as a complex innovation ecosystem. According to the definition of the European Network of Living Labs (ENoLL), a Living Lab is both a user-driven methodology and an organization. The literature identifies several dimensions: it can be interpreted as a research methodology, a physical infrastructure (natural living and working environment), and an innovation ecosystem in which users, researchers, companies and public sector actors collaborate.

Theoretical frameworks: Relationship with open innovation

The theoretical basis of the Living Lab is the Open Innovation paradigm. According to Henry Chesbrough’s theory published in 2003, companies need to break away from the traditional, closed innovation model, where development takes place exclusively within the company. Open innovation recognizes that useful knowledge is widely spread outside the boundaries of the organization, so the involvement of external ideas and technologies – or even the spin-off of internal ideas – is essential for competitiveness.

The Living Lab is one of the most advanced practical implementations of open innovation, which focuses specifically on the involvement of users. While early open innovation models focused mainly on technology transfer between companies, the Living Lab puts “user-driven innovation” at the center. The goal is for the consumer to not only be a passive buyer of the final product, but to participate in value creation as an active “co-author” from the early stages of development.

The Living Lab as a methodology and ecosystem

The essence of Living Lab is to take research and development processes out of the walls of laboratories and into real life. This environment provides structure and guidance for users to actively participate in the innovation process.

  • Real environment: Experimentation and development do not take place in isolation, but in the everyday lives of users (at home, at work, in urban spaces).
  • Multi-stakeholder cooperation: A “Public-Private-People Partnership” (4P)-based cooperation where the scientific sphere, the corporate sector, the government and civil society (users) work together.
  • Methodological diversity: Living Lab is not a single method, but a set of tools and procedures that includes needs assessment, joint planning (co-design), prototype development and real-time testing.

In domestic practice, for example in the ELTE and TINLAB programs, this methodology is aimed at identifying and solving social problems. Here, the “laboratory” is society itself, where experts search for adaptable “good practices” through fieldwork and workshops, involving stakeholders.

The role of the user: “User-centric” vs. “User-driven” approach

One of the key issues in the Living Lab theory is the depth of user involvement. The literature distinguishes between “user-centric” and “user-driven” innovation, although in practice these are often confused.

  • User-centric: In this model, developers solicit and observe users, but the process is still fundamentally guided by experts. Here, the user is more of a passive subject or tester.
  • User-driven: This is the higher level of Living Labs, where the user is put in the “driver’s seat” of the innovation process. Here, it is not just about testing, but also about co-creation, where the end user is an active shaper of design and concept creation.

A true Living Lab is created where collaboration goes beyond simple testing, and the experience and knowledge of users are integrated into the core features of the product or service.

Strategic importance: Bridging the “pre-commercial gap”

From an innovation policy perspective, one of the most important functions of Living Labs is to bridge the so-called “pre-commercial gap”. This is the critical phase between applied research and market launch, when the prototype already exists but is not yet a mature product.

In traditional models, companies often rely only on their inner intuitions in this phase, which is associated with high risk: a significant number of new products fail after launch because they do not meet real market needs. Testing and joint development within the framework of a Living Lab drastically reduces this risk. Through real feedback, products and services can be “fine-tuned” before market launch, thus increasing the chances of success and the efficiency of development.

Living Lab Ecosystem: Quadruple Helix Model in Practice

A new dimension of innovation collaboration

One of the most important insights of modern innovation systems is that complex social and economic challenges cannot be solved by isolated actors. The Living Lab concept builds on this insight to create a dynamic ecosystem, the structural basis of which is the Quadruple Helix model. While the previous Triple Helix model focused on the cooperation of universities, industry and government, the Quadruple Helix introduces civil society – the users themselves – as the fourth and most critical element in the innovation process.

This model is not just a list of stakeholders, but an operating mechanism in which the knowledge, resources and perspectives of different sectors come together for a common goal – social innovation and value creation.

The actors of the Quadruple Spiral model and their functions

Each actor in the Living Lab ecosystem has a specific, irreplaceable function. The condition for successful operation is the coordination of these roles and the exploitation of the synergies between them.

The Academic Community (Academia)

Universities and research institutes – such as Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE) and the Innovation Center in the current program – provide the methodological background and scientific validation.

  • Role: They serve as neutral mediators and knowledge bases. They provide the research framework, the innovation mentoring methodology, and the documentation and analysis of the processes.
  • Added value: Scientific rigor and theoretical background guarantee that the resulting solutions are not only imaginative, but also well-founded and adaptable.

 

The Public Sector and Government

The public sector has a dual role: on the one hand, it is a financier and regulator, and on the other hand, it is often the “customer” of social innovations.

  • Role: Providing the legal and financial framework (e.g. through the European Social Fund Plus) and setting strategic guidelines. By establishing National Competence Centers, the state actively supports the building of innovation capacity.
  • Added value: Public policy support is essential for the systemic dissemination and sustainability of solutions.

 

The Private Sector and Companies (Industry)

Businesses and social enterprises bring the market perspective, technological implementation and the requirement of business sustainability.

  • Role: Practical implementation of developments, providing technological background and bringing products/services to the market. Through open innovation, SMEs can also access external knowledge that increases their competitiveness.
  • Added value: Ensuring market realities and economic feasibility, and scaling prototypes.

 

Civil Society/Users

The most important innovation of the model is the involvement of citizens, NGOs and end users as active, equal partners.

  • Role: Not passive test subjects, but “owners” of the problems and co-creators of the solutions. They are the ones who know the social problems the most deeply and will use the solutions developed.
  • Added value: Channeling real needs and experiences. With their participation, one of the most common pitfalls of development can be avoided: creating solutions for which there is no real demand.
Interactions and Synergies in the Ecosystem

The power of the Living Lab lies not in the isolated activities of individual actors, but in the interactions between them. In the program outlined in the attached documents, this takes the form of 2 x 2-day fieldwork and workshops.

  • Co-creation: During the process, scientific methodology meets civic experience and corporate implementation. This “intersection” allows for the creation of social innovation practices that are both professionally sound and workable in practice.
  • Networking: National and transnational networks (e.g. the Austrian-led consortium) help the flow of knowledge between countries and sectors, laying the foundation for future activities.
Strategic Advantages of the Model

The application of the Four Spiral model in Living Labs brings several strategic advantages:

  • Risk reduction: Since all stakeholders (especially the end user) are involved in the development from the early stage, the chance of failure can be minimized.
  • Social embeddedness: Solutions do not come “top-down”, but are created with the involvement of the community, thus their social acceptance is greater.
  • Faster adaptation: Through testing in a real environment (Living Lab), prototypes receive immediate “live” feedback, which speeds up the innovation cycle.

The Living Lab ecosystem implements true open innovation through the Four Spiral model, where academia, government, industry and citizens respond to societal challenges in close cooperation and with a common force.

The current Living Lab program under the auspices of ELTE and TINLAB

Institutional background and international context

The currently announced Living Lab programme is part of a wider European-wide initiative. Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE) is a member of an Austrian-led international consortium that operates national competence centres for social innovation in five European countries. The programme is funded by the European Social Fund Plus, one of the most important drivers of social innovation in Europe.

The programme is implemented within the framework of Social Innovation Plus (SI Plus), the primary objective of which is to build and develop the professional capacity for social innovation in the countries concerned. The international objective of the consortium is to gain a deeper understanding of the different political, economic and social conditions for social innovation and to identify the conditions for the establishment of regional and national networks. National and transnational synergies and networks will help to disseminate the concept of social innovation and lay the foundation for future activities.

Program objectives and enhancing social innovation

The Living Lab program, launched by domestic implementers, has the fundamental goal of identifying significant social problems. The initiative focuses on finding solutions that can be adapted and used as “best practices” in the future.

A key strategic element of the program is professional capacity development with the involvement of all relevant stakeholders. This approach – in line with the Living Lab methodology – integrates the public sector, the scientific community, civil society institutions, as well as private companies and social enterprises. The program also aims to further develop the existing innovation mentoring methodology in a live situation and make the acquired experiences an integral part of their knowledge base.

Operating mechanism and methodology

The professional background for the implementation is provided by the National Competence Center, with the support of experts from the ELTE Innovation Center. A special expert working group will be established within the framework of the program, which will support the handling of the selected problems not only on a theoretical level, but also in practice.

The structure of the work process is as follows:

  • Duration and form: The joint work takes a total of four days, which is implemented in the form of 2 x 2 days of fieldwork and workshops.
  • Stakeholder involvement: The expert group not only directly supports the work of the organization raising the problem, but is also able to involve a wider range of stakeholders.
  • Ecosystem building: The process also aims to actively shape the social awareness of the local ecosystem and strengthen the solution-centric approach.

This structured cooperation allows the participants to deal in depth with the given social challenge and work together with the invited experts on the solution proposals.

Methodology in practice: The Living Lab innovation cycle

Overview of the iterative development process

Living Lab is not a one-off event, but an iterative process. Unlike the traditional “waterfall model”, where design is linearly followed by development and launch, Living Lab is based on continuous feedback. In practice, this means that from any phase of development it is possible to go back to an earlier stage if user feedback justifies it.

The process is often based on “FormIT” or similar spiral methodologies, which are based on three main pillars: design, experimentation and evaluation.

Exploration and Preparation

Every Living Lab project begins with mapping the problem space. In this phase, the focus is not yet on the solution, but on a deep understanding of user needs and the environment.

  • Stakeholder management: Identifying and involving ecosystem actors (researchers, companies, government, civil society). According to the uploaded documents, this means creating an expert working group in the domestic program and involving a wider range of stakeholders.
  • Research: Applying ethnographic methods, in-depth interviews and observations in the users’ natural environment. The goal is to uncover hidden needs (“latent needs”) that users may not be able to articulate themselves.
    Defining the framework: Recording the project’s goals, resources and ethical rules (e.g. data protection).
Co-creation & Co-design

This is the “heart” of Living Labs. This is where the transition from passive observation to active collaboration takes place. Users and experts sit at the same table as equals.

  • Workshops: Moderated events where concepts are developed using creative techniques (brainstorming, gamification, design thinking). In the current ELTE/TINLAB program, this is implemented as a 2 x 2-day workshop, where the organization raising the problem and the experts work together.
  • Scenarios and Personas: Development of typical user characters (personas) and use cases, which help to focus on real-life situations during design.
  • Democratized innovation: The task of the experts here is not to “tell” but to include user ideas in a professional framework and examine their feasibility.
Prototyping

The results of shared thinking need to be made tangible. In the Living Lab environment, prototypes range from a simple paper-based sketch, a beta version of a working software, or, in the case of social innovation, a model of a new service process.

  • Rapid prototyping: The goal is to create something that can be tested as quickly and cheaply as possible. The goal is not perfection, but testability.
  • Service design: In the case of social problems (as in the referenced program), a prototype often means a process description, a new customer service model, or a draft of a community program that is tested in a simulated environment.
Experimentation in a Real Environment (Experimentation)

This step distinguishes the Living Lab from all other development methodologies. The prototype is taken from the laboratory into the real world (“in the wild”).

  • Field tests: Users use the new solution in their own homes, workplaces or urban spaces. For example, in the case of Botnia Living Lab, users used the mobile security service in their own daily lives.
  • Real-time data collection: Continuous recording of data generated during use (e.g. sensor data, logs) and user reactions.
    Bridging the “Pre-commercial Gap”: This phase bridges the gap between applied research and market launch. This is where it becomes clear whether the idea that works in the lab survives the chaos and challenges of everyday life.
Evaluation and Feedback

The final stage of the process is data analysis and learning.

  • Multidimensional evaluation: Not only technological functionality is examined, but also user experience (UX), social acceptance and business/sustainability potential.
  • Iteration: Based on the results, a decision is made:
    The solution is ready for implementation.
    The solution needs to be modified (step back to design).
    The basic idea is flawed (step back to discovery).

This structured yet flexible methodology ensures that the social and technological innovations created within the Living Lab truly respond to user needs and do not remain just theoretical solutions.

A Living Lab relevance

Strategic Fit: InnoK as an innovation broker

The literature on innovation systems – especially the available studies – highlights that the key to the success of Living Labs is often the presence of a dedicated, intermediary organization. InnoK Knowledge Management Institute Nonprofit Kft., due to its profile, is an ideal candidate for this “orchestrator” role in the local ecosystem.

By definition, a Living Lab is an open innovation ecosystem where users participate in development in collaboration with actors from the public sector, companies and science. For InnoK, this model is not just a theoretical framework, but an operating principle. The organization is able to bring all four actors of the “Quadruple Helix” model – the municipality (as owner), local businesses, scientific partners (e.g. ELTE) and the district population – to the same table.

The current ELTE/TINLAB program specifically aims to identify social problems that can be adapted for solutions. This provides a direct connection point for InnoK: the organization can be the field (“lab”) where these social innovation solutions are tested in practice, under controlled conditions, in the district.

Conceptual clarification: Urban Lab vs. Social Lab – Differences and overlaps

Understanding the relationship between InnoK’s activity (Urbanlab) and the referenced application program (Social Lab) is crucial for building the relevance matrix. Although the methodology – the Living Lab – is common, the focus areas are different, but complementary.

Urban Living Lab

This approach traditionally focuses on technology-based urban development, “Smart City” solutions. Examples in the literature, such as Botnia Living Lab, often appear as technological testbeds (e.g. mobile services). The profile of InnoK Urbanlab fits into this category: testing developments in the fields of urban infrastructure, transportation, waste management or energy in a real environment.

Social Living Lab

The program announced by ELTE and TINLAB focuses on social innovation. Here, the “product” is not a technological tool, but a new social practice, service model or community solution (e.g. elderly care, unemployment management, digital inclusion). The goal is to deeply understand social problems and jointly develop solutions with stakeholders.

The synthesis: Smart Citizens instead of Smart City

The relevance becomes obvious where these two areas meet. No technological (Urban Lab) development can be successful without social acceptance (Social Lab).

  • Connection point: For InnoK, adopting the Social Lab methodology creates an opportunity for Urbanlab projects to not only be technocratic solutions, but to respond to real social needs. The methodology of social innovation helps district residents to not only be passive users of smart solutions, but also active shapers (“smart citizens”).
InnoK logo fehér
Linkedin Facebook Instagram Youtube
Contact
Menu
  • © 2025 Copyright InnoK Tudásmenedzsment Intézet Nonprofit Kft. - All Rights Reserved.